Story Poster
Photo by NBC News

Should Pastors Be ‘Restored To Ministry’?

July 1, 2024
6,363

It has become commonplace to hear of a pastor, whether they are a New York Times bestseller or the one down the street, falling into sin and that sin being brought to light. Usually, these stories follow the same basic pattern: the sin is discovered, the pastor makes a public statement in which he apologizes and repents, before being eventually restored and brought back into the position he previously held. Such is the case with many of the recent controversies and scandals that have surrounded Robert Morris, Tony Evans, T.D. Jakes, Perry Noble, Mark Driscoll, and unfortunately numerous others. Whether it involves sexual sin (Morris), alcohol abuse (Noble), self-control, (Driscoll), or some ambiguous unnamed sin (Evans) - it has all become so commonplace we don’t even question when this happens. Almost never does anyone ask, “Should restoration back into pastoral ministry even take place?” After all, we are taught that grace, mercy, love, and forgiveness should play a part in all we do, so it seems unloving to query another believer’s restoration. 

But is that really what we would be doing? You see, there are two different potential kinds of restoration in play here, particularly when it pertains to pastors: We could be speaking of restoration back into fellowship with the church community (Galatians 6:1; James 5:19-20; 1 Corinthians 5:1-5) or we could be speaking of restoration back into a pastoral position. 

This is where we often go wrong. While we have plenty of scriptures that both instruct and urge us to restore repentant believers back into community we have none that speak of restoring pastors that have fallen into sin back into their position of authority. We actually have the exact opposite: a list of qualifications for those who aspire to the office of pastor. These qualifications set the bar for those that will lead Christ’s Church. 

For those unfamiliar with these qualifications a quick read-through of  1 Timothy 3:1-7, Titus 1:5-9, and 1 Peter 5:1-5 will give you a basic overview of what they are. Many of those mentioned in these verses are identical across all three passages and where qualifications are unique you can see a general connection in the others. These qualifications are there to ensure that Christ’s Church is led by men that will be faithful and lead well. 

So what is a local church to do if a pastor becomes disqualified by sinning in a way that means he no longer can hold the office of elder? Whilst I fully agree with the idea of being restored to the body, for many this is only the first step before going on to restore them to their pastoral position. I do not consider this to be Biblical.  

Before giving my reasoning, allow me to address the common rebuttals to my position. There are three primary biblical examples of sin and repentance that people point to when seeking to restore a pastor to ministry.

Firstly  King David, his sin with Bathsheba, his repentance and his subsequent restoration.  to God, and his restoration as a result (See 2 Sam 11-12, Psalm 32 for details).  The question we have to ask here is: does David have an office like that of a pastor or is this repentance and restoration what we would expect of anyone that follows God? David is acting as a ruler of a people, akin to a President or Prime Minister repenting and being restored. Even in this case restoration doesn’t come without consequence: the child that is born from this sin will die (2 Samuel 12:14-18) and David is put to shame (2 Samuel 12:10). While it is true that the Lord shows David mercy (2 Samuel 12:13) the results that come from this sin follow him the rest of his life.

 

The second example is that of Peter after his denial of Christ. In John 21:15-19  we see Jesus asking Peter if he loves Him three times after each time telling him to do something as a result of his love for Him; to firstly   “feed my lambs”, then “tend my sheep”, and lastly “feed my sheep”. Jesus then finishes the conversation by telling Peter how he would die for the glory of God. This does not, however, appear to be a restoration back into ministry, but rather a new call into a new ministry which he did not previously walk in.

Finally, some point to a later interaction with Peter and Paul, where Peter clearly acts hypocritically, and thus his repentance after Paul confronts him can be seen as the same as a pastor repenting after being called out for sin (Gal 2:11-14). So if Peter was still qualified for ministry after this interaction then surely a pastor now would be qualified for ministry after repentance as well, right? 

The context of the verse helps us here: so far in this epistle, Paul has called out the Galatians for turning to a “different gospel” (Galatians 1:6-10), and spoken of meeting with the Apostles in Jerusalem to affirm the Gospel he preaches, as well as his ministry to the Gentiles (Galatians 2:1-10). As such, Paul reminds them of this incident in order to demonstrate that Peter’s behavior functionally compelled Gentiles to live like Jews, and Jews to live as if the law could justify them; the very point Paul wanted to refute. While it is clear that Peter was in the wrong in this situation, it does not demonstrate that Peter sinned in a disqualifying way and could be reinstated.

So what do we mean by a “disqualifying sin”? I’ve included a side-by-side comparison of the lists of the qualifications found in 1 Timothy 3:1-7, Titus 1:5-9, and 1 Peter 5:1-5 at the bottom of this article for reference, but let me summarize them: an elder must be above reproach, maritaly faithful, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not a drunkard, not violent, gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money, manage his household well, not be a new convert, have a good reputation, be holy, be disciplined, not lord over others, and be an example to the flock.  

By definition,  if one is qualified by meeting these standards, then by either not meeting them or sinning in such a way that you no longer continue to meet them disqualifies you.  .  If a man is not faithful to his wife, or proves himself to be greedy, or is undisciplined, or can’t teach scripture, or is found to not be above reproach, he becomes disqualified. 

But what if a pastor, after failing to meet such qualifications, repents and is found to meet them thereafter? Well, Paul demonstrates the answer across many of his epistles. In Titus 2:7-8 Paul writes to Titus and tells him to be an example of what is good, and to show integrity in his teaching as well as soundness in his speech so that he cannot be condemned. Likewise in when Paul writes to the Romans, specifically addressing the Jews, he states that the way they have lived among the Gentiles has caused the Gentiles to blaspheme God and not take him seriously (Romans 2:24). Still yet in Philippians Paul instructs believers to live in blameless ways, not grumbling or arguing so that they stand out from the crooked generation they live in. In doing so they will be seen as different and Christ will be honored (Philippians 2:14-15). Though many of these are written generally to believers and not specifically to elders, it shows an overall point: actions matter.  

If pastors are to be those that live as an example for other believers to aim for (2 Peter 5:3; 1 Corinthians 11:1) then those within those positions, while not sinless, must be examples worthy to be held in honor (1 Timothy 5:17). Pastors should demonstrate humility, faithfulness, devotion, speech, and self-control. While pastors, like all believers, will fail to live sinless lives until Christ’s return, the scripture is clear that teachers will be judged more harshly (James 3:1). Of course, failure to uphold these standards within the office of elder after the qualifications have been made so clear, doesn’t disqualify one from being restoration to the body after repentance. But it does seem to call into question the idea of restoration to the office after they have proved to not be able to live in a manner worthy of the call. 

To put a man back into the position of pastor after disqualifying himself is to lower the authority of the office. It would be similar to putting a police officer that had purposefully broken the law back on the force; it’s irresponsible for no other reason than he has already proven himself to be unqualified for the job. 

 

Clear Truth Media
Caption

 

Should Pastors Be ‘Restored To Ministry’?

6,335 Views | 2 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by Stillneedgrace
Skylerharris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
While I have no defense for any sinful actions by anybody, there isn't any good biblical case for a man who repented and turned from a sin issue years and years ago and could have been much further sanctified by the Spirit, why that man couldn't serve the Lord in a pastoral role. Those Verses speak of an ender in his current state. An elder must be this. A drunkard is not someone who was an alcoholic 20+ years ago or someone who got drunk once. An adulterer is not someone who committed adultery once 20+ years ago. If so, then nobody who has committed adultery, or other types of sin, will ever see the kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 6:9-10). Saying someone can never ever be restored to a place of leadership like elder IS to ignore what it means to be restored and sanctified over time by the Holy Spirit. We're being made new, are made new and will be made new. And though disqualification from eldership is necessary at the time, I see no reason why years down the road when they have genuinely repented, been cleansed of their sin issue and have been further sanctified, God can use them in that position again. How this directly applies to Robert, I don't fully know. I don't know if he truly repented way back then or not.
Stillneedgrace
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think there should be some middle position where we avoid the extremes of never allowing repentance and restoration for leaders and the hiding, ignoring, or excusing of serious moral violations because it's easier, we like their style, we don't want to face the truth, etc.

Let's look at the example of Robert Morris. I believe he was already disqualified to be a pastor/elder because of his frequent misleading, false, or heretical teaching. There was plenty of public information to disqualify him (not able to teach the word) long ago, similar to guys like Benny Hinn, Bill Johnson, Kenneth Copeland, and many more. But let's set that aside for the moment and talk about the recently revealed scandal.

Robert Morris has made many claims of confessing and repenting from this sin of the past. He sort of did but was it real when he repeatedly claimed that he just stumbled into a trap that she laid for him? He has given the impression that it was a short indiscretion where a peer tempted, ensnared, and then blackmailed him to continue for some time. He has repeated similar things for decades until now.
Contrast this to the report that he actually molested a 12 year old girl repeatedly for 4 1/2 years at the house of a fellow minister that he stayed with. He only stopped after she told someone when he tried to get her to go further. I am skeptical that he never behaved like this again but let's give him the benefit of the doubt. He still misrepresented, outright lied, and blamed her for decades saying she had a Jezebel spirit. He tried to make it not seem as bad as it was and even get some sympathy as partly a victim instead of him being a repeat predator.

He still can and I hope he fully and sincerely repents. However even if he does, it will be very difficult for him to ever meet the qualifications like "being above reproach". With full repentance he would not be concerned with making himself look good but with the reputation of Jesus Christ, His church, and the gospel, that is to say obeying and glorifying God. He would be fully apologizing to everyone he lied to. He would be offering whatever restitution he could to the young girl, now woman, that he hurt. He would be apologizing to the others he made complicit in his crime and hiding it. He would be willing to face the consequences if needed from the courts. While never being a pastor again, if he would truly humble himself and repent he could be an example of what that looks like. That might do far more good than all his years of pastoring. God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.

Keeping a high standard for leaders in the church for the health of the body of Jesus Christ doesn't mean that fallen and repentant leaders can no longer serve. There are many other ways for us to serve God. If someone like Robert Morris could ever be restored to leadership than it would certainly look different than it has with him. There would have to be complete honesty, and a long long period of time to fully establish trustworthiness, especially for one who already claimed to be a Christian. However there are some actions where people cross a line and it just isn't wise to put them back into leadership. Even after 30 good years, will people ever trust that we're following someone blameless who did those things? There is a big difference between our congregation welcoming the lost who repent and having that person be the leader with the power, authority, and influence that can easily be abused and they have to excersise self control.

Looking at the history of church leadership in the past few decades, I don't think we have been erring on the side of being too strict.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.