Agree - but can you give examples

Often its not the content as such but how we respond - eg in teaching not just what's there but what its there-for. The application has to be real. Maybe encouraging feedback during/after the teaching may help.

There is also the whole area of not recognising how truly strange the Bible's description of God is, there are lots of paradoxes. We tend to not show these for fear of putting people off, we have to be reasonable - but actually you can't make reasonable sense of the atonement even, or the incarnation, without recognising that there is something deeply strange and deeply, incredibly wonderful about it.

Even faith - it's not believing a set of propositions as such, but projecting forward from the assumptions of those propositions, to God's character and intentions, and acting on that.